“Make Way for Mr. Scaredy Pants” (by Geoffrey Thorne)

Geoffrey Thorne is multi-talented. He’s an actor who, in the 80s and 90s, appeared in many hit television shows, including Hillstreet Blues, ER, In the Heat of the Night, and Diagnosis Murder. By the early 2000s, he had turned to television writing and producing.  He was a writer-producer on the cable TV show Leverage, which ran through the end of 2012 and was recently voted Favorite Cable TV Drama; he has also written for Law and Order: Criminal Intent and other series. Novel writing is in the mix too: He’s the author of the Star Trek: Titan novel Sword of Damocles and other books, including several graphic novels. Several of Geoff’s short stories have appeared in nationally distributed anthologies, but his first mystery story is in the March/April issue of EQMM, which goes on sale next week.  Despite all of these accomplishments, the Los Angeles author has a reverence for the Mystery that has made him hesitate, previously, to try his hand at it. We’re glad he finally did!—Janet Hutchings

This isn’t my normal thing.

I want that out front so all the devotees of mystery fiction and gifted writers thereof understand that, for me, landing a story in America’s premier mystery fiction magazine is a miracle of cosmic proportion that is equal parts terror and thrill.

In fact, let’s all pause while I do an interpretive dance describing both my sense of achievement and absolute humility over this event.

*

*

*

*

*

*

Good. Thanks. Excellent. Now, as I was saying. . .

I’ve read only a few true mystery novels aside from the complete Doyle and a smattering of modern writers such as Turow. James Lee Burke’s Dave Robicheaux series is tops on my list, because, WOW.

I’ve read a few more short stories than novels. More than I thought before I sat down to write this but nowhere near as many, I’m sure, as have the folks who read this.

I would also like it known that, along with Comedy, I consider Mystery writing to be the most difficult branch of the tale-spinning field and, coward that I absolutely am, I have made a point of steering as far as possible from both of these genres for most of my so-called career.

You know why. You know it every time you make it halfway through a reasonably well-written mystery and you find yourself ahead of the story. You know it when you make it all the way to the end of the yarn where the bastard author “reveals” it was that no-name bellboy, the one who had one line, on one page, at the opening of the novel, who was the secret mastermind of all the killings even though he never appeared again in the entire six thousand-page tome.

You want to find that guy and murder him yourself, right? Sure, you do. We all do. His days are numbered.

But, the thing is, in that guy’s defense, this stuff is hard.

There are clichés to avoid and tropes to shore up; you have to play fair with the audience while never letting them get ahead of you. You can’t make the mystery too hard to solve; you can’t make it paper-thin. It’s a juggling act, done on a high-wire over a pit of vipers and, no, nope, sorry, I’m just not brave enough to climb up there. Because I’m just not, that’s why.

Mystery, like Comedy, is filled with traps and I make a point to avoid traps in all aspects of my life. Coward, remember? How many times do I have to say it?

So, why am I here, holding the tennis balls, about to step out on the wire?

Well, because of two things, really: the caprice of editors (Lord knows what goes on in that chaos behind their eyes) and my wife.

You see, generally, I write elves, superheroes, super spies, super thieves, space aliens, stuff like that. Stuff which, for the most part, she declines to read, even when it’s me writing. She wants something real, she says, even in her fiction.

To date this unfair (yet oddly firm) position of hers has prompted the writing of a novel, Better Angels, and the story I have in the upcoming issue of Ellery Queen’s Mystery Magazine.

The other reason I’m often drawn to Mystery as a reader while shying away from it as a writer is that mysteries, I think, more than other forms, more closely mirror Life. This means they are about death, even when they’re not.

Think about it. You creep through a mystery yarn, trying to find clues that will help you sort out the story. You think you have something but it turns out to be the wrong something but then that leads you to something else that you hadn’t thought of but which, for a time, makes things clearer. Life. Lifety, life, life.

Then, at the end, whether you sussed it all successfully or were pulled up short by the author (Fairly. Always fairly.), the story ends and you’re done. Over.

That’s life. At least it feels that way to me. Any story that feels like life, any genre that does, therefore, really, feels a little like death.

Every story that ends with anything other than the characters’ funerals is one that is cut short, yes? Because, no matter how many dragons are defeated by maidens rescuing their prince, Life really ends in the grave for everybody. Mysteries not only embrace this principle, they’re made of it.

Yikes, right? Chilly. So, you understand why I mostly shy.

But, I do love a good one, is the problem. Like moths love candlelight.

Filmed. Prosed. Poemed. Pencilled. There’s something hypnotizing about the form that keeps us all coming back. Even us cowards. Once you’ve been bespelled enough times, if you’re a writer, you’re going to want to put your toe in to test the waters.

The good news for me is, they don’t have to be played straight. One of my favorite mystery stories, “The Macbeth Murder Mystery” by Thurber, isn’t one. And yet it absolutely is. Neil Gaiman’s “Murder Mysteries” is set in Heaven and features several familiar angels; so magic is certainly acceptable as long as the rules are followed. The Colorado Kid, by Stephen King, has to be one of the most frustrating and engaging pieces of fiction, Mystery or otherwise, I’ve ever read. It proves breaking a fundamental rule can be as rewarding as following them all without flaw.

Brave guys like that make room for cowards like me to dip in that toe, to test. Spouses like mine add that extra push.

My test is “The Playlist.” It’s not as funny or deft as Mr. Thurber’s work (as if) nor as delicately beautiful as Gaiman’s (as if, again) but it’s my kind of mystery. Which is to say, it’s the sort I hope my wife will read. I hope it’s your sort too.

If it is, I’ll keep at it and, in a decade or so, I might be bold enough to try comedy.

Posted in Fiction, Guest, Writers | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

“A Lifetime With Ellery Queen” (by Francis M. Nevins)

On this first day of new postings for 2013, our first order of business has got to be to wish everyone who visits our blog a happy New Year! Our first post, however, is one in which we depart from the New Year’s tradition of ringing out the old and ringing in the new and hope that at least as it pertains to that great, but sometimes forgotten, writer Ellery Queen, we can help ring some of the old back into contemporary consciousness.
This month, Francis M. Nevins’s new critical book Ellery Queen: The Art of Detection: The Story of How Two Fractious Cousins Reshaped the Modern Detective Novel, sees print, from Perfect Crime Books. This blog has intentionally veered away from promotion of books by authors contributing guest posts, but in this case we make an exception, since everyone at EQMM hopes to see the writing duo that founded our magazine introduced to a new generation of readers.
 If anyone is in a position to write interestingly and incisively about our field in general and Ellery Queen in particular, it’s Francis M. Nevins (known to his friends in the field as Mike). He’s a two-time winner of the prestigious Edgar Allan Poe Award for critical work, once for an earlier study of Ellery Queen and once for his volume on Cornell Woolrich.  He is also a novelist, and a short-story writer whose work has appeared many times in the pages of EQMM.  I suspect we’d have seen much more fiction from Mike over the years had he not often been immersed in critical projects, but I’m looking forward to reading this new work on Queen, so I won’t object. —Janet Hutchings

On January 6 of this year I turned 70. On January 15 a hefty tome of mine called Ellery Queen: The Art of Detection will be published. In a sense I’ve come to the end of a road: at my age it’s unlikely I’ll write about Queen again, certainly not at such length. Where did that road begin?

I was one of those strange children who somehow learned to read before they first set their little feet in a classroom. I was about four years old at the time. In one of the last conversations I had with my mother before her death, she insisted she hadn’t taught me and guessed that somehow I had taught myself by playing with a set of alphabet blocks.

I never saw my father reading much but he must have been an avid reader as a young man. At age nine or ten I discovered on his shelves The Benson Murder Case (1926), the first of S.S. Van Dine’s once hugely popular Philo Vance detective novels. At the foot of the front cover was my father’s name (which was also mine) in tiny gold letters. Perhaps that was what led me to try reading the book. Big mistake. I gave up after a few chapters, skunked by Van Dine’s sesquipedalian ponderosity.

That abortive encounter was either my first or second experience with detective fiction. The other encounter, probably within a year before or after the Van Dine debacle, took place at the home of one of my uncles, a heart surgeon. What I was doing at his house I have no idea, but one or both of my parents must have been with me. Somehow I discovered a bookcase and happened to pluck out a volume with a bright orange cover and began reading. It was the International Readers’ League edition of The Chinese Orange Mystery (1934) by Ellery Queen. If I didn’t get past the first few chapters, it was only because my parents were taking me back home. I was a precocious kid but too shy, I guess, to ask my uncle if I could borrow the book. My loss.

The next time I encountered the Queen name was in the public library of Roselle Park, New Jersey. I was still too young to be allowed into the grown-ups section, but among the juvenile fiction I found and checked out was Ellery Queen, Master Detective (1940), which wasn’t a genuine Queen novel but a “novelization” based on the movie of the same name—which itself was more or less based on a genuine Queen novel! (The Door Between, if you want to get technical about it.) This novelization I read straight through. Almost sixty years later I still remember one line. It’s dinnertime and Ellery is “sawing manfully at his steak” which has been prepared for him by his culinarily deprived new girlfriend Nikki Porter. That and two other novelizations of movies about Ellery were not written by the cousins Frederic Dannay and Manfred B. Lee, as the genuine Queen novels and stories were, but were farmed out—or, as we say nowadays, outsourced—to ghosts. As chance would have it, I learned the name of one of those ghosts recently, in a document containing the vast majority of the letters Manny wrote to Fred while they were living on opposite coasts. The true author of Ellery Queen, Master Detective was Laurence Dwight Smith (1895-1952), a long-forgotten hack who also wrote mysteries (some for adults, some for kids) and nonfiction books under his own name. Whether he wrote the other EQ novelizations remains unknown.

On turning thirteen, I was given access to the adult sections of the library. It was there that, with chance or fate as the wind at my back, I found the mystery fiction shelves and discovered Sherlock Holmes and Charlie Chan and was hooked for life. Exactly when I started reading Ellery Queen I can’t recall but I can still see myself sitting in a creaky old green-painted rocking chair in front of my grandmother’s house during the heat of the 1957 summer, lost in ecstasy as I wandered with Ellery through the labyrinths of The Greek Coffin Mystery. I was fourteen at the time and had just completed my first year of high school. Before graduating from college seven years later I had read most of the Queen novels, several of them two or three times apiece. I had also watched both of the Queen TV series from those years—the low-budget, 30-minute films (1955-56) starring Hugh Marlowe, the first actor to play Ellery on radio, and the more elaborate hour-long program (1958-59), originally live and later on tape, with George Nader and then Lee Philips in the title role—but neither was remotely in the same league with the Queen novels and stories.

One Saturday afternoon during my senior year in high school I was returning to Roselle Park after taking the College Board entrance exam. Changing trains at Newark’s Penn Station, I passed a newsstand, saw the current issue of EQMM (April 1960), and plunked down 35 cents for it. By that time I must have bought many back issues at the secondhand bookstore I passed every day on the way home from school, but this was the first issue I had bought new. I still remember the occasion vividly.

After college I was offered a scholarship by New York University School of Law. The academic work was a thousand percent harder than anything I had encountered before, and for the three years of law school I all but stopped reading for enjoyment. A year or two after graduation and admission to the New Jersey bar came one of the great moments of my life, my first meeting with Fred Dannay. I can still see myself stepping off the train at Larchmont and being greeted by Fred and his then wife Hilda and being driven to their home on Byron Lane. Fred was in his early sixties at the time, several years younger than I am today. Since EQMM had a policy of publishing in every issue a story by someone who had never written a mystery before, he almost had to encourage everyone he met to try to write for the magazine. He certainly encouraged me.

I had exchanged a few letters with Fred’s cousin and collaborator, Manny Lee, but I only met him once. It was in April 1970, just before the annual Mystery Writers of America dinner. We had arranged to meet “under the clock” in the lounge of New York’s Biltmore Hotel. Just as we were shaking hands a young man sitting nearby jumped up like a jack-in-the-box and shouted “Manfred B. Lee! I think you’re the greatest writer that ever lived!” To which Manny replied: “That doesn’t say much for your taste.” I would have given much to have known him longer but he died less than a year later.

A few years passed between my first meeting with Fred and my first fiction sale, but when the May 1972 issue of EQMM hit the nation’s newsstands, there was my name on the cover along with those of Agatha Christie, John Creasey, Edward D. Hoch and other luminaries. It was all I could do to keep myself from shouting HEY!!! THAT’S ME!!! whenever I went into a store that carried the magazine. Until his death in 1982 Fred bought many more stories from me, as did his successor Eleanor Sullivan and her successor Janet Hutchings.

My book Royal Bloodline: Ellery Queen, Author and Detective was published in 1974 and received an Edgar award from Mystery Writers of America. I was in my early thirties then. As I write these words I’ve just turned 70. Perhaps Ellery Queen: The Art of Detection should have been called Royal Bloodline 2.0. It’s certainly more comprehensive than my earlier book, and better written (I hope), and does justice to Manny Lee as Royal Bloodline, I’m afraid, didn’t. What I wish most of all is that my hefty tome will return the name of Ellery Queen, author and detective, to the minds and hearts of the mystery-reading public, where it belongs.

Posted in Books, Ellery Queen, Guest, History, Magazine, Writers | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

HOLIDAY SHORTS

With Christmas less than a week away, I decided to repeat the search for new anthologies of Christmas mysteries I made two years ago and update my post about it from the www.themysteryplace.com forum. In 2010, the only new holiday anthology I found in print was Otto Penzler’s Christmas at the Mysterious Bookshop, a collection of stories originally produced as limited-edition pamphlets and offered to customers of the bookstore as Christmas gifts. This year, I discovered that the trade paperback of that collection had appeared since my last post on the subject (October 2011, Vanguard). Another paperback of an earlier hardcover edition worth mentioning is Candy Cane Murder (Kensington, 2011), featuring three novellas by Joanne Fluke, Laura Levine, and Leslie Meier. (The latter has contributed to EQMM). Also in 2011, Wildside Press brought together holiday tales from authors who include EQMM/AHMM contributors Ron Goulart, John Gregory Betancourt, and Liz Zelvin, in X is for Xmas: 10 Christmas Mysteries. 2012, however, comes up dry—at least as far as my Googling reveals. There are a number of individual holiday stories available electronically, but no new Christmas anthologies.

A decade ago, Christmas was as reliable a theme with anthology readers as cats; anthology publishers snapped up anything Christmas-themed. Perhaps that’s changed with the rise in popularity of the noir anthology. Not that noir and Christmas don’t go together at all, but the great majority of Christmas mysteries, at both novel and short-story length, are whodunits, and they tend, stylistically, toward the cozy end of the spectrum. There’s scarcely a big name in the world of the traditional mystery who hasn’t, at one time or another, written a Christmas short story or novel, and most of those books remain in print. There’s at least one collection of Christmas short stories by Simenon in reissue; Agatha Christie’s Hercule Poirot’s Christmas seems to get reprinted every few years; Anne Perry has penned a whole series of Christmas mysteries (the latest, A Christmas Garland, released by Ballantine on October 30, 2012); and Mary Higgins Clark has collaborated with daughter Carol Higgins Clark on a series of Christmas suspense novels. Lists that will guide you to other notable Christmas mysteries can be found at several Web sites, including www.cozy-mystery.com and www.goodreads.com.

It’s easy to see why Christmas would appeal to mystery writers. There’s such a contrast between the conviviality and good cheer assailing one at every turn and the stresses that underlie the season. Just the kind of dramatic opposition a writer needs; and isn’t it also one of the governing principles of cozy writing that murder should occur in a setting in which it’s neither normal nor expected? Then there’s the fact that Christmas is rife with secrets: presents that are meant to be a surprise; kids trying to discover what’s been hidden away and perhaps uncovering some dangerous adult secrets along the way.

There’s also the similarity between the traditional country-house setting used by writers of mystery’s golden age and the ordinary household at Christmas time: the family and other guests all closed in together (especially if there’s a good snowstorm); a little naughtiness under the mistletoe; a few offensive guests tippling too much rum-laced eggnog. Pretty soon you’ve got some motive brewing, and as for ways to carry out a murder, all those Christmas treats with their concealing spices are a culinary killer’s delight.

A lot of the Christmas mysteries we see at short-story length are humorous or satirical; there’s a lot of room for that in the distance that exists between the ideal of Christmas and its frequent reality. Others stories are, in a spirit truer to the holiday, redemptive in tone. This year half of our holiday issue (January 2013) consists of Christmas or New Year’s stories, starting with Peter Lovesey’s whodunit about a traditional seasonal treat, the mince pie, and continuing with bell ringers, disaffected suburbanites, and, finally, a New Year’s ghost. They’ll give you a good idea of the range of stories the season inspires.

You also won’t want to miss episode 40 in our podcast series, “A Good Man of Business,” the Christmas story that won last year’s Robert L. Fish Award for best short story by a new writer. Its author, David Ingram, not only does the podcast’s reading, he composed and performed the accompanying music.

If I’ve missed any new holiday anthologies, I hope readers of this blog will write and mention them. This would also be a good time—with just five shopping days left!—to let others know what your favorite Christmas mystery novels and stories are, so that they can find their way into someone’s Christmas stocking.

We will be taking a two-week break from posting new articles on this site, returning on January 9th.

In the meantime, here’s wishing all of our readers holidays full of merriment, (gentle) mischief, and a little mystery! —Janet Hutchings, EQMM

Posted in Anthologies, Bookshops, Fiction, Setting | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

“Something Is Going To Happen” (by Cheryl Rogers)

In her post for us this week, Australian Cheryl Rogers describes herself as a new writer. That may be true in terms of the length of time she’s been at it, but she is already a well-recognized writer of short stories. Two of her stories (“Cold War” and “King Brown”) have won the Partners in Crime (Sydney) yearly short story award. Another story, “Farewell to the Shade,” was shortlisted for the 2009 S.D. Harvey Award, and she also won the Henry Lawson Society of New South Wales Award three years running. An amazing record for a newcomer! Cheryl’s stories regularly appear in Woman’s Day and Woman’s Weekly (England) and much of her short crime fiction has appeared in EQMM after its first publication in Australia. —Janet Hutchings

In Art class last year my teenage son produced a photo-mosaic self portrait. It comprised 4400 tiny photographs that he’d taken around our home, in the vineyard and orchard that surrounds it, and at his school. They represented just some of the visual vignettes that had helped to shape his view of the world, as a person and as an artist.

That portrait hangs now on the landing and I pass it every time I climb the stairs to sit at this computer and try to write. From a distance, the images mesh together to flesh out a believable likeness of a boy I recognise as my son. Up close it’s a mish-mash; coloured pencils in the art room, the cane laundry basket where he throws his dirty clothes, an embroidered kneeler in the school chapel.

I’m no expert on art, but am told that the portrait embodies the Pop Art ethos of removing images from their context to create new meaning. That makes perfect sense to the writer in me. It’s what I try to do with words. I bang my head against the wall in an effort to bring together snippets of an eavesdropped conversation, a colourful turn of phrase, the bones of a storyline saved years ago in a shoebox, and somehow weave it all together into a believable shape.

As a novice in the field of crime-fiction writing, I am all too painfully aware that the shape must also be palatable enough for the reader to swallow; hook, line, and hopefully sinker.

How then do we fill the well, that store of reserves inside the notebooks and boxes, but mainly inside our head, where we spend so much of our time? How do we build up a collection of meaningful ideas for plots, settings, and characters? And where do we find the tools to extract them, dust them down and shape them into a believable whole? By answering these questions maybe we can start to unlock the mystery that is the process of writing.

I went looking for clues among the bricks that have helped to pave my personal writing journey. Because, as much as it might sound like a lame line from a lousy crook, I really don’t know how I got myself into this. Writing crime fiction, that is. It seems to have sprung from nowhere, like a menopause baby.

The tool “discipline” almost certainly entered the mix in primary school. We had a strict headmaster who made 10-minute creative writing exercises part of the morning routine. I was too young to appreciate the benefits of regular writing then, besides, I was too busy self-editing. He was a stickler for that, too.

Around this time black-and-white television came into our household and with it the dawn of realisation about technique. Alfred Hitchcock was a regular visitor to our lounge room, supplying my first taste of stories like Roald Dahl’s “Lamb to the Slaughter.” A re-run of O. Henry’s Full House, particularly “The Last Leaf,” both moved and intrigued me. I can still remember the sharp stab of surprise when that last leaf stayed put. Those great names meant nothing to me then, but their words and ideas had hooked the interest of this small girl on the other side of the world. Knocked for six by the sting in the tail. I’ve been a sucker for it ever since.

A Science degree sharpened my research skills and set up an interest in botany and zoology. They are useful tools now when I’m trying to work out a novel way to bump off a victim. Or trap a crook.

The best part of 15 years as a rural journalist honed my note-taking skills, taught me to respect editors, deadlines and readers, and to deliver the story whether or not the subject matter interested me.

That job also helped stock up my store of vignettes. It brought me into contact with vast wheatbelt landscapes, picture perfect farms, dense forests. And people. I was paid to listen, to write down what was said, then shape it all into something coherent back at the office. So developed my “ear” for nuances of speech and an appreciation for colourful turns of phrase. Words that would help inject some personality into a feature article.

A working holiday overseas brought new landscapes, new accents, and new and unfamiliar jobs into the mix. I spent a summer season as a press officer at a Butlin’s Holiday Centre in rugged North Wales, job-hopped as a temporary secretary in London, pumped a bicycle through the streets of glorious Cambridge during a year as a general reporter on the Cambridge Weekly News Series. All the while I was writing regular letters home and keeping a journal, building up a stash of pen portraits, anecdotes, snapshots of that fleeting phase. I had no idea then just how valuable those notes would become later, to help authenticate a place, a person, a mood. Had I known then what I know now, I’d have been more diligent.

It was only after I’d returned to Australia, married, had two children and was coping with the seasonal demands of a commercial vineyard and orchard, that I seriously contemplated writing short fiction. It had always appealed to me as a reader, because it is so accessible and can deliver such a satisfying punch.

I’d been reading quite a bit of short crime fiction—Roald Dahl’s Tales of the Unexpected; The Best British Mysteries—but hadn’t seriously considered writing it. I wasn’t even sure I could. I felt a bit like Lucy at the back of the wardrobe, pushing against the door into Narnia. Then I started entering the Scarlet Stiletto Awards, an annual award to recognise female crime writers in Australia, and scraped on to the shortlist once or twice.

The funniest thing is that once I’d started the process of trying to write crime, the story ideas came rushing in like a pack of wild dogs. All those vignettes, stored inside my head and in the journals and letters and notes stashed in archive boxes, came out of hiding to flesh out the bones. I found myself starting to think differently. My journalist’s mind had been trained to keep a lookout for interesting story ideas, but generally they had a rural or community theme. Suddenly, I was thinking an awful lot about crime. At a school athletics carnival, for example, my husband and I once found ourselves sitting a little apart from the other parents. We were quietly discussing the merits of a starter’s pistol as a murder weapon.

I don’t pretend to understand how the writing process works. I do know it is never, ever easy. And that something happens; bits from the past come together to help form characters, plot, even dialogue. That’s if I make a start on a story and leave myself open to whatever flotsam and jetsam enter the mind. Then I keep working at it, adding new layers, the way an artist might coax out an image.

For example, one day out in the vineyard, I was stung by a paper-nest wasp. I’d been rattling my brain for a plot to set in an old gold-mining settlement we’d once visited. The hot, sharp pain brought to mind the time my Grandad was stung on the tongue. He’d been given some wild honey containing fresh honeycomb and there must have been a groggy bee or at least the sting inside it. I played around with that as a murder method, matched it up with the gold-town setting and “Such Rage of Honey” (EQMM, March/April 2008) was the eventual result. Grandad survived that bee sting by the way—but Grandma needed a medicinal brandy.

The process of writing that story also threw out another idea from the memory store. I needed a tag, something to mark a character as eccentric. So I gave the villain an imaginary dog, which he’d “walk” using a reinforced collar and lead. Sounds far-fetched? It was based on something I’d seen a children’s entertainer do when working in Wales.

Once I got going, this sort of thinking started adding a whole new dimension to the family holiday experience.

On a trip to Broome, an old pearling town in the tropics north of Perth, other tourists seemed only to be interested in the beautiful beaches and the pearls. I was mesmerised by the number of whacky ways to die: sharks, crocodiles, stone fish, cone shells, tides that swept in faster than a man could run. All set in a place where the outback meets the ocean.

One night we were waiting for dinner in a little outdoor café. I became aware of an older couple, seated at another table, sipping their drinks in total silence. As they disappeared into the gloom towards their campervan, I leaned across to my husband and whispered: “Let’s just hope that if we stay married that long we have at least one word left to say to each other!”

“Pearler” (EQMM, February 2007) grew from that 10-minute observation. I saw domestic indifference, maybe even disharmony. A romance writer may perhaps have interpreted the same scene as companionable silence. Contentment, even.

“London Calling” (EQMM, September/October 2009) came from my hankering to revisit the white stucco house where I inhabited a tiny bedsit in the early eighties. Out came those letters, written home years before, to provide real events as a backdrop to the fiction and move the story along. The central character’s lifestyle bore a striking resemblance to what mine had been, hence she was relatively easy to write. For the record, my temping did not include a stint with a chemical company. Nor have I ever cocktailed anyone’s coffee with herbicide.

At first I stuck to writing about what I knew. It seemed safer. Then my son came home from school one night and described a forensic police officer he’d observed examining the scene of a classroom burglary—blonde, Mohican haircut, blue boiler suit. Straightaway I could see the potential for a character there and decided to run with it. DC Anna (“Spanner”) Swift has popped up in three stories now—“Cold War” (EQMM, September/October 2011), “Farewell to the Shade” (EQMM, February 2012) and “Wine On Ice” (pending publication in EQMM March/April, 2013). Spanner is young, fast-talking, has a passion for cars, and has what my Grandma used to call “a mechanical brain.” She’s a logical thinker, which is why she made the leap from Traffic to Major Crime. Having little interest in cars, I’d never even remotely considered creating a motor-mad motor-mouth but I like her and she’s good for me; she pushes me out of my comfort zone.

I’ve never had a full manicure complete with gel-tip nail extensions either. Unlike the central character in “Serious Bling” (EQMM, August 2011). That story grew from my bemusement at the amount of time and money spent on nail adornment. Which got me thinking: What if a nail technician had a unique style? And what if that particular style could be linked to a crime?

My new best friend Google helps out with the research now, whenever I venture into unfamiliar territory or want to revisit an old haunt. What luxury to be able to walk—or more accurately, haul myself along the marked arrows—down the pavements in a foreign country, thanks to Google Earth.

I’m hooked on this form of writing now, when the demands of family and the land we live on allow it, which is not often enough. I love trying to create a puzzle for the unknown reader whose intelligence must always be respected. Always trying to achieve that delicate balance between clues and red herrings. I get to create and spend time with some interesting characters driven by a range of emotions—greed, ambition, revenge, a sense of right and wrong. Crime is a serious and often sobering subject, but crime fiction is essentially entertainment, a form of escapism for both reader and writer.

EQMM has become an important part of this novice’s education. The magazine slips easily into my handbag, or the seat pocket in the car. So I can tap into the talent and try to learn something if there are a spare few minutes before the school bus pulls in. When a story really connects I search through old copies of the magazine for other work by the same writer. The late Edward D. Hoch and Brian Muir, Doug Allyn, Val McDermid, Melodie Johnson Howe, and David Dean are among the names on my growing watch list. British writer Mick Herron is a standout. He is so skilled at playing the reader like a fish, then delivering an ending that is as satisfying as it is unexpected.

I may never unlock the mystery of the writing process, how the bits come together like a montage on a wall. But then, why should analysis spoil the ride? It’s enough to know that when we sit down to try, something is going to happen. . . .

Posted in Characters, Editing, Fiction, Setting, Writers | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

“Looking Back on a Half-Century Love Affair with EQMM” (by Josh Pachter)

Josh Pachter falls into an unofficial group connected to EQMM that he doesn’t mention in the following post: most valued friends of the magazine.  He started out in the category we treasure most of all: devoted EQMM reader. From there, by the trail of events he describes, he became an accomplished short-story writer and contributor to the magazine. (Although he has had little time for fiction-writing over the years, he has produced at least four dozen published—and often reprinted—short stories!)  His work as a scout and translator for EQMM’s “Passport to Crime” feature has greatly enriched that department.  Few others have contributed to EQMM on so many levels or for so long.  We’re counting on him to be with us as we move into the future; it’s having people like Josh on board that makes EQMM  the magazine it is.—Janet Hutchings

We are a fairly exclusive club, I suppose, and our membership grows oxymoronically and sadly smaller every year.

Depending on whether or not you count Clayton Rawson, EQMM has had either three or four editors since its 1941 debut. Officially, Frederic Dannay (who, with his cousin Manfred B. Lee, wrote as Ellery Queen) served as the magazine’s editor-in-chief from its inaugural issue through 1981, long-time managing editor Eleanor Sullivan was editor-in-chief from 1982 until 1991, and Janet Hutchings, who took over the editor-in-chief’s chair in 1991, remains there today. Clayton Rawson was listed on the masthead as EQMM’s managing editor, never editor-in-chief, but he ran the day-to-day operations of the magazine from 1963 until his death in 1971.

And the club I mentioned above has as its membership those of us who’ve had the opportunity to get to know all four of them face-to-face. There can’t be all that many of us left.

In the spring of 1966, Fred Dannay was sixty-one years old, EQMM was twenty-four, and I was fourteen. One day, Mary Ryan, my ninth-grade English teacher, handed me a copy of the June ’66 issue of EQMM and told me she thought I might like it. I have no idea what it was about me—or about her—that caused her to single me out. Sure, I’d read a couple of the Sherlock Holmes stories, but they were really my only exposure to crime fiction up to then—and I don’t remember having found them especially interesting.

 EQMM June 1966

I took Miss Ryan’s gift home with me, though, and a whole new world opened up to me as I devoured Agatha Christie’s “The Gate of Death,” Stanley Ellin’s “Death of an Old-Fashioned Girl,” Kelley Roos’s “Murder Underground,” John Creasey’s “The Greyling Crescent Tragedy,” and the rest of the slim 159-page magazine’s contents.

Immediately, a new monthly ritual became the long walk up Jerusalem Avenue to the candy shop at the top of the hill, where I plunked down my fifty cents for the latest issue of the first magazine I’d truly enjoyed since Highlights for Children and Boy’s Life and MAD. Margery Allingham, Robert Bloch, John Dickson Carr, Celia Fremlin, Edward D. Hoch, Talmadge Powell, Joan Richter, Frank Sisk, Nedra Tyre, James Yaffe—and of course Ellery Queen himself—all new to me, all mysterious and brilliant and as addictive as crack.

EQMM 1967 AnthologyIn addition to its regular monthly issues, EQMM began publishing an annual anthology of reprints in 1960. In 1963, these anthologies started appearing twice a year instead of once, and, early in 1967, I paid the candy-store proprietor $1.25 for a copy of Ellery Queen’s 1967 Anthology, which was #13 in the series—and which contained a reprint of Richard Deming’s “Open File,” a novelet which had originally appeared in the December 1953 EQMM. The story was a police procedural in which the investigating officers fail to solve a crime—a murder, if memory serves. When I finished reading the story, though, I thought—in my fifteen-year-old wisdom—that the cops had botched their investigation, that there was in fact sufficient evidence presented in the story to pin the crime on a specific one of its characters.

For reasons I won’t pretend to remember, I actually wrote a new ending to Deming’s story and sent it off to EQMM—and, in due course, I received a handwritten letter on EQMM stationery from Frederic Dannay himself!

For many years, that letter was one of my prize possessions. Sadly, I lost it when, after a dozen years in Holland and Germany, I moved back to the US in 1991. I can still remember, word for word, the way it ended, though: “Have you ever considered writing a detective story yourself? Seems to me, Josh, if I may, you should!”

So of course I did. I mean, duh.

I came up with the idea of a cop who loved mystery stories so much that he named all eleven of his kids—apparently Inspector Ross Griffen of the Tyson County Police Force was a Catholic—after famous fictional detectives: Albert Campion, Gideon Fell, Sherlock Holmes, John Jericho, Jane Marple, Perry Mason, Parker Pyne, Augustus Van Dusen, Peter Wimsey, Nero Wolfe—and, of course, Ellery Queen. In my story, sixteen-year-old Ellery “earned his name” by solving in a Queensian manner a jewel theft which was baffling his father . . . while simultaneously botching his investigation of a neighborhood mystery, the theft of three apple pies destined for a church bazaar.

I typed the story up on my little nonelectric typewriter and sent it off to Fred Dannay’s home in Larchmont, New York. A month or so later, I was in my bedroom one afternoon when the phone rang and my mother yelled up the stairs, “Josh! It’s for you!”

“Who is it?” I yelled back.

“It’s Frederic Dannay!”

Furious, I clomped downstairs to the kitchen, snatched up the receiver, and barked, “Dad, this isn’t funny.”

It wasn’t my father trying to be funny, though. It was Fred Dannay, telling me he liked my story and wanted to publish it.

EQMM December 1968Fred wanted some changes, I gladly made them, and “E.Q. Griffen Earns His Name” appeared in the December 1968 issue of EQMM, #325 in the magazine’s “Department of First Stories.” I was sixteen when I wrote the story, seventeen by the time it was published, making me the second youngest writer ever to appear in the pages of EQMM. (The youngest was James Yaffee, whose first story was written at the age of fifteen and published in 1943.)

As a professionally published author, I was eligible for membership in the Mystery Writers of America. I applied, was accepted, and at seventeen became the youngest active member in the history of the organization. This got me an invitation to the MWA’s annual Edgar Allan Poe Awards banquet, where I had the opportunity to meet both Fred Dannay and Manny Lee face-to-face. Manny was polite, but Fred was absolutely effusive, and he led me around and introduced me to many of the writers I’d grown to idolize, treating me—as did almost everyone I met—as not just a punk kid but a colleague. Ed and Pat Hoch, John and Barbara Lutz, and Stan and Marilyn Cohen were especially kind to me, and over the years Dorothy Salisbury Davis, Patricia McGerr, Lawrence Treat, Bob Fish, Don Westlake, Joyce Harrington, Ed Wellen, Dan Marlowe, Morris Herschman, Chris Steinbrunner, Warren Murphy, and many others were also much nicer to me than I can possibly have deserved. I saw Mr. Dannay again at several subsequent Edgar banquets, and he always took the time to talk with me—and always left me feeling that our conversations mattered every bit as much to him as they did to me.

Since my family lived on Long Island, it was easy for me to take the train into Manhattan, and I would often go in during the day to visit the EQMM editorial offices at 229 Park Avenue South, then stick around for the monthly cocktail party in the MWA’s cramped offices in the Seville Hotel on East 29th Street. Fred worked from home in Larchmont, but managing editor Clayton Rawson was always in his office at 229 Park when I dropped by, and he always welcomed me, always made time to spend an hour with me. A professional magician himself, Clayton used the world of stage magic as the backdrop for most of his fiction—his four novels, all written in the late ’30s and early ’40s, and many of his short stories featured as their detective “The Great Merlini.” Whenever I would visit Clayton in his office, he would entertain me with sleight of hand, and he was good at it, certainly the best close-up magician I’ve ever seen. During one visit, Clayton handed me a copy of the April 1951 EQMM and told me to select any story in the issue, add up the digits of the page number of the story’s first page, and count to the that-manyeth word of the story. I did so—and he announced that the word was “problems,” which was correct. Although magicians traditionally don’t reveal the secrets of their tricks, he explained to me that Fred Dannay had edited the beginning of every story in the issue as a favor to magician Richard Himber, so that, no matter which story was selected, the word that appeared in the position corresponding to the sum of the digits of its first page would be “problems.” (Mike Nevins wrote about the April 1951 EQMM in his article “The Dannay Years,” which appeared in the magazine’s November 2011 issue.)

 EQMM April 1951

My most vivid memory of Clayton Rawson was the day when he handed me a book of matches and insisted that I light them, one at a time, and throw them, blazing merrily, into his open mouth. I’m not sure that technically qualifies as magic, but it was certainly magical to me.

After Clayton’s death, Eleanor Sullivan became EQMM’s managing editor, and she and I grew to be fast friends. Always smiling (though always a little harried and mussed), she, like Clayton before her, welcomed my visits, first to 229 Park and then, after the magazine’s editorial offices moved about twenty-two blocks uptown, to the new space at 380 Lexington. We’d often go out to lunch together, and when I visited her during the colder months, she always insisted on trying on the weird furry winter coat I’d bought at Barney’s Boys Town on 17th Street.

By the time Fred Dannay died, in 1981, he’d bought seven of my stories for EQMM—three about the Griffen family, another a spoof of two of Ed Hoch’s series characters (“The Theft of the Spy Who,” September 1972), and a couple of one-offs. I was married to a Dutch woman by then and living in Amsterdam, teaching for the University of Maryland’s European Division on US military bases in Holland, Germany, England, and Greece—and no longer writing fiction. Why did I stop? That’s complicated—it’s probably easiest to say that my focus had shifted from writing to teaching and leave it at that.

In 1982, as Eleanor Sullivan moved up from managing editor to editor-in-chief after the death of Fred Dannay, the University of Maryland sent me for four months to Bahrain, in the Persian Gulf, to teach at a little Navy base in Manama, the tiny island emirate’s capital (and only) city.

Bahrain fascinated me, and I wound up staying for eight months instead of four and returning to the writing of crime fiction with “The Dilmun Exchange,” the first of what would ultimately be a dozen stories about Mahboob Chaudri, a Pakistani detective on the Bahraini Public Security Force. Eleanor bought it for the July 1984 EQMM, and the last half of the ’eighties were far and away my most prolific period in the mystery-fiction bidnis.

In addition to the Chaudri stories, I also conceived the idea for a project I planned to call Partners in Crime. My idea was that the book would consist of a dozen or so short stories, each written by two authors working together—and, in each case, one of the two authors would be me. Although the book never happened, about fifteen stories wound up being written, and most of them were published individually. EQMM ran my collaborations with Ed Hoch (“The Spy and the Suicide Club,” January 1985), Stanley Cohen (“Annika Andersson,” February 1993) and Jon L. Breen (“The German Cologne Mystery,” September/October 2005), and I also sold Partners in Crime stories written with Edward Wellen (“Stork Trek,” Alfred Hitchcock’s Mystery Magazine, July 1985), Michael Avallone (“Better Safe Than Sorry,” Hardboiled, Summer/Fall 1987), Joe L. Hensley (“All That Mattered,” Robak’s Firm, 1987), John Lutz (“DDS 10752 Libra,” An Eye For Justice, 1988), Dan J. Marlowe (“The Seven-Year Bitch,” Hardboiled, 1990), and Francis M. Nevins (“The Leo’s Den Affair,” Dick Tracy: The Secret Files, 1990).

During this same period, I edited a series of “Author’s Choice” anthologies, beginning with Top Crime: The Author’s Choice (St. Martin’s Press, 1984) and continuing with Top Science Fiction, Top Fantasy and Top Horror (all of which were published in various European countries, but not in the US), and translated a couple of Janwillem van de Wetering’s Grijpstra and de Gier stories from Dutch into English for EQMM.

Meanwhile, my marriage didn’t survive my time in Bahrain, and I wound up living in Germany from 1983 to 1991, still teaching for the University of Maryland on American Army and Air Force bases.

And in ’91, right around the same time that Eleanor Sullivan passed away, I moved back to the US and settled in Cleveland, Ohio.

I haven’t done all that much in the mystery field since my return, although I’ve translated stories by Theo Capel, Rene Appel, Carla Vermaat and Tessa de Loo from Dutch into English and by Bavo Dhooge from Flemish into English for EQMM’s “Passport to Crime” series, which has given me the opportunity to get to know Janet Hutchings, who took over as editor-in-chief after Eleanor died and has now served in that position for over twenty years.

A couple of years ago, Janet bought a story called “History on the Bedroom Wall” and ran it in the “Department of First Stories” in EQMM’s September/October 2009 issue, which I believe makes me the only person who’s ever appeared in the DFS twice—first as a teenager in 1968 and again aged 58 in 2009.

How could such a thing happen? Well, although it wasn’t written as a part of my Partners in Crime project, “History on the Bedroom Wall” was written collaboratively, and the story was published as “by Rebecca K. Jones and Josh Pachter.” Rebecca K. Jones is my daughter Becca, who was born in Germany in 1986. In 2009, she was twenty-three and a second-year law student at the University of Arizona, and writing a story with her was unquestionably the high point of my “career” as a writer.

Today, Becca is a deputy county attorney in Phoenix, and my wife Laurie and I live in Virginia, where I teach communication and film-appreciation classes at Northern Virginia Community College. I continue to do translations for “Passport to Crime” from time to time, and every once in a while I write a new story of my own. When Janet published my “iMurder” in the July 2011 EQMM, that made me a member of another pretty exclusive club—there aren’t many of us who’ve published new fiction in the pages of Ellery Queen’s Mystery Magazine in six consecutive decades, but I’ve now been in there in the ’60s, ’70s, ’80s, ’90s, ’00s and ’10s. If I can hang on a few more years, perhaps I’ll show up in the ’20s, too, and I’m not sure if anyone has yet hit EQMM in seven consecutive decades.

When I moved from Germany back to the US in 1991, I lost not only my original 1967 letter from Fred Dannay but almost everything else I owned—looong story; I’ll spare you—including treasured photos of me with Fred, Clayton, and Eleanor.

In October of this year, though, Laurie and I drove to Cleveland the weekend of Bouchercon to visit with my dear old friend Les Roberts (who writes the Milan Jacovich novels and was B’con’s “Special Cleveland Guest”) and his lovely girlfriend Holly Albin. We also had the opportunity to spend some time with my even older friend John Lutz and his lovely wife Barbara, and Janet very graciously took time out of her busy schedule to have a drink with Laurie and me.

So I’ve at least got one photo of me with an EQMM editor, and I’m happy to share it with you here. (Janet’s the pretty one. I’m the other one.)

EQMM5

Fred, Clayton, Eleanor, and Janet: It’s actually kind of amazing to think that EQMM has only gone through three (or four, if you count Clayton) editors in over seventy years.

But I consider myself honored and blessed to have had the opportunity to have known all four (I darned well count Clayton, whether you do or not!) of them. They—and EQMM itself—have been a very important part of my life for almost half a century now, and I look forward to continuing my relationship with the magazine and its leadership till death do us part!

Posted in Conventions, Editing, Guest, History, Magazine, Writers | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 16 Comments

“Going Postal: The Particular Pleasures of Workplace Murders” (by Meredith Anthony)

When it comes to different lines of work, Meredith Anthony has known more than most people. She’s a humorist whose work has appeared in MAD Magazine and Hysteria; she’s done stand-up comedy; she was the writer and partner for the Spilled Milk collection of greeting cards; she’s a reviewer of theater and film; she has co-authored and produced a play and an award-winning short film; and she has written several feature-length screenplays. And that is not even to mention her primary career as copywriter for a major New York ad agency. Or her fiction writing, which includes novels and several stories for EQMM. Her most recent novel, Ladykiller (Oceanview 2010), was co-written with her husband, Lawrence Light.—Janet Hutchings

So a guy goes to his office and greets all his variously annoying colleagues. There is the usual variety of flirtations, animosities, eccentricities. He toils at meaningless paperwork all morning, unappreciated, underpaid, unhappy. At lunchtime, it’s his turn to go out to the deli. He takes everyone’s orders. When he comes back with a large, leaking paper bag, he finds the office strangely quiet. A quick inspection reveals that every single person at his workplace has been shot to death.

This, of course, is the beginning of James Grady’s great thriller Six Days of the Condor. I once asked Jim Grady about the enormous success of the book and the subsequent film, Three Days of the Condor, and he laughed and told me that he thought it struck a chord with every working stiff. Everyone at the office is dead. Haven’t we all secretly wished for that to happen?

I have always loved mysteries set in a workplace. I like the insider’s view of a profession I know nothing about, the chance to watch employees work, learn some of their jargon, be privy to the office politics, catch the rhythm of their days. I like to immerse myself in the world of this new profession. And when murder strikes, I like to watch how the workplace does or doesn’t go on in the wake of the shocking event. Do the employees dab their streaming eyes and carry on with working? Does the place shut down while the police investigate? Do colleagues begin to look at one another with distrust and suspicion?

I leave out books set in cop shops, detective agencies, and those about medical examiners, military police, and government spies. Procedurals certainly have their appeal, but I’m talking about books set in a workplace that typically does not deal with violence professionally.

Many professions have their exemplars. Robin Cook and Michael Crichton wrote medical thrillers that invited us into hospitals. More recently, Michael Palmer, Douglas Lyle, and CJ Lyons have mixed medicine and murder. John Grisham, Scott Turow, and others bring us inside the lawyer’s office and the courtroom. Steve Frey and Christopher Reich offer a glimpse into Wall Street. Journalism is the setting explored by Scotland’s Denise Mina and (full disclosure, he’s my husband!) the wonderful Larry Light.

For corporate America, Joseph Finder excels. His Killer Instinct, for instance, is set in a Boston electronics giant where an ambitious, but not very successful, young executive is unwittingly assisted by a security guy he befriends. The security man starts helpfully eliminating anyone who gets in the way of the hero’s upward mobility. The hero is, of course, aghast, but isn’t this every thwarted working person’s wish fulfillment? Don’t we all secretly want that bitch in the corner office to die?

Having worked in advertising for some years, I always wanted to find a mystery set in a big-city ad agency. My experience is that although ad agencies are high-pressure businesses with a typical corporate pyramid structure and a profit and loss statement, in fact they differ significantly from most white-collar office settings. Ad agencies are businesses where a great many of the employees are hired specifically for their imagination and artistic talents. Highly paid and skilled copywriters and art directors are not ordinary office drones. They pride themselves on their quirks and most agencies give them a lot of leeway in work habits, office décor, and dress. Cubicle walls may be covered in bananas, skulls, or fish. Christmas lights, black lights, or no lights are common. Clothes may be chosen to show off piercings and tattoos. Pets, unicycles, and mini-refrigerators full of booze are not uncommon. In fact, it occurs to me that these “creatives,” as they are called, frequently get away with murder. I decided to take that notion a step further. I was delighted to have a chance to explore this setting in a short story, “Murder at an Ad Agency,” which will appear in the March/April 2013 issue of EQMM.

Facing a rack at Barnes and Noble, or listing on Amazon.com, we all have our ways of choosing a new book to read. Some of us choose to read mysteries by subgenre—cozies, police procedurals, amateur sleuths, thrillers, noir. Others choose by setting—big cities, foreign settings, historicals, Westerns. Some look for a certain type of protagonist—strong women, damaged cops, cats. Some readers look only for favorite authors, series, or standalones. Me? I look for a new workplace—Jane Cleland’s antiques business, Hank Phillippi Ryan’s TV station, Julia Spencer-Fleming’s Episcopal church, Barry Eisler’s freelance assassin, Christa Faust’s porn star, to name just a few.

One of my all-time favorite office mysteries is a noir thriller by the amazing Duane Swierczynski. Severance Package is the perfect update on James Grady’s Condor classic. Here’s the set-up. The boss has asked seven employees to come in to work at 9 a.m. on a Saturday for a special meeting. Irritable and suspicious, they all comply. He locks them in and announces that he’s going to have to kill them all. Seriously? On a Saturday at 9 a.m.? Now, if that isn’t the beginning of a really bad day at the office, I don’t know what is.

Posted in Fiction, Guest, Setting, Writers | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 17 Comments

“From Noir to Julius” (by Dave Zeltserman)

 Dave Zeltserman’s crime-noir novels Small Crimes and Pariah were both selected by The Washington Post as best books of the year. His short story “Julius Katz” won the Private Eye Writers of America’s Shamus Award for best P.I. story, and a second story in that series, “Archie’s Been Framed,” won EQMM’s Readers Award. His most recent book, Monster: A Novel of Frankenstein is neither noir nor mystery, but horror. You can see from the extensive range of his books and stories that he’s particularly well qualified to talk about the challenges of writing in a variety of forms. Here he discusses his experiences in going from noir to puzzle murder mysteries. . . . —Janet Hutchings

When my story “Julius Katz” (EQMM September/October 2009) was published, it must’ve surprised my readers. Up till then, most readers knew me from my dark and violent noir novels and stories. “Julius Katz” is very different from my noir writing in its gentle humor and endearing characters, and is mostly a bloodless story where the murders take place off screen. My Julius Katz stories are somewhere between pastiche and homage to Nero Wolfe—a mix of hardboiled and traditional mystery where a brilliant but incredibly lazy detective has all the evidence gathered, questions the witnesses, and then points out the guilty party. The hardboiled element in both Rex Stout’s Nero Wolfe and my Julius Katz stories is represented by a wisecracking assistant who narrates the stories. With Nero Wolfe the assistant is Archie Goodwin. In my Julius Katz stories, the assistant is also named Archie, but there the similarities with Archie Goodwin end, as my Archie is a computer device the size of a tie pin, but with the heart and soul of a hardboiled PI. And with his self-adapting neuron network, my Archie wants nothing more than to learn enough by observing Julius so that he can beat him to the punch in solving a case.

So why go from writing noir to Julius Katz stories? Well, my reading has always been diverse, and as much as I love hardboiled and noir literature, I’ve always also loved the Nero Wolfe books. Next to Hammett, Rex Stout is probably my favorite crime/mystery author. The reasons for reading noir and Nero Wolfe are very different. A noir story will grip you as it drags you along with its protagonist on a one-way ticket to hell. These stories tend to be violent and can be psychologically fascinating, as well as provide insights into the human condition that few other mystery and crime stories are capable of. Nero Wolfe books are read for enjoyment and entertainment, as well as Rex Stout’s wonderful writing. At the heart of every Nero Wolfe book is the murder mystery, but what really drives these books is the relationship between Nero and Archie and the humor that comes out of it. You enjoy spending time with both characters. While there can also be humor in noir, it tends to be brutally dark humor, and while the characters in noir fiction can be fascinating, these aren’t really characters you want to spend much time with—at least, no more than the time to read a single book. When I made the decision to write my first Julius Katz story (and it was an intimidating decision, given how much in awe I am of Rex Stout’s writing and his books), I decided that what was going to drive these stories was the relationship between Julius and my Archie, and particularly the humor that would come out of their relationship. Even though my Archie is a piece of computer technology, he appears very human and endearing because he’s such an innocent.

The following excerpt is taken from my full-length novel Julius Katz and Archie and has Archie very annoyed with Julius for agreeing to what he considers a humiliating publicity stunt for the sake of a rare bottle of wine.

“I thought your dignity and reputation weren’t for sale?” I asked.

A wry smile pulled up the edges of Julius’s lips. “I don’t believe I ever said anything about my reputation being priceless,” he said.

“Okay, your dignity then.”

More of his wry smile. “Technically, Archie, I don’t believe I as much sold my dignity as bartered it away.”

It was a clever joke, but I wasn’t much up to joking then. More of that excess heat began to burn in me. “For a lousy bottle of wine! That’s what you did it for!”

“I hardly think you can call a ’78 Montrachet a lousy bottle of wine.” Julius’s smile faded as he sat straighter in his chair and rubbed his thumb along the knuckles of his right hand. With others, Julius kept his emotions and thoughts impenetrable, with me he didn’t bother. Right now he was showing his annoyance, but I didn’t care. “The man is a philistine,” Julius continued. “He was going to mix soda water with a ’78 Montrachet to make a wine spritzer. It would’ve been a crime to let that happen.”

“So you were just saving humanity from an outrage?”

“Precisely.”

“Okay,” I said. “I understand. For a bottle of wine, you’ve agreed to play a stooge.”

Julius stopped rubbing his knuckles. He took in a slow breath and with a forced attempt at humor, said, “And of course, twenty-five thousand dollars.”

“Of course, we can’t forget the twenty-five thousand dollars. So for that money and the Montrachet, you’ll be looking like a dunce to the world.”

“Again, Archie, things are not always what they appear.”

“Yeah, well, as far as the TV and newspaper reporters are going to be concerned, Kenneth J. Kingston will be trumping you at your own game. Should I be ordering you a dunce cap now for the occasion? I might be able to find a good deal.”

Julius slowly began rubbing his knuckles again. “Enough of this, Archie.”

I should’ve taken the hint, but I couldn’t help myself. “Sure, of course,” I said. “I understand. But boss, should I get a jump on updating your biography to reference that you’re no longer Boston’s most brilliant detective, but have slipped to the second-most? Or should I wait until after Kingston plays you for a chump? Now that I think of it, after that happens I’m not even sure you could legitimately claim that title, since every other working private investigator in Boston would probably be able to prove themselves intellectually superior to Kingston, so by the transitive property, that would, in effect, make you Boston’s least brilliant detective. Not as compelling a title for you to hold, but I guess we’ll have to deal with it. If you want I can order stationery now to that effect, or I can wait until—”

I had pushed him too far. Julius cut me off, saying, “Goodnight, Archie.” And blast it! My world went black as he turned me off!

I’d like to talk a little about the different challenges of writing noir and Julius Katz stories, particularly how plotting and outlining each are so very different. While some writers like to have only a general idea of the beginning and end and let the writing be an adventure, others, like myself, like to have a detailed outline before starting a story or novel. Usually my novels will take detours from my outlines, and sometimes, major characters that I hadn’t previously thought of will force their way into the book, but without an outline for a roadmap, I feel lost.

When plotting noir, I tend to first come up with my flawed protagonist and the scenario that is going to send him on his noir journey, while also at this point usually seeing my protagonist’s ultimate fate. Then it’s a matter of coming up with increasingly dire situations for my protagonist to find himself in once he crosses that moral line that can’t be uncrossed, until in the end he has no choice but to tumble into the abyss. Using my novel Small Crimes as an example, I first developed my protagonist, Joe Denton, as a corrupt ex-cop who wants desperately to believe he’s not a bad guy and can go through life without causing any more damage. Except, it’s all self-deception. The scenario I came up with for Joe was that nine years earlier he had broken into the district attorney’s office to destroy evidence that would’ve sent him to prison, and when the DA walked in on him, he ended up brutally maiming the man. The novel starts with Joe being released from county jail and finding that nobody wants him around anymore—not his parents, his ex-wife, or anyone who ever knew him, and further, the DA is out for blood, wanting badly to find a way to send Joe to prison for the rest of his life. The no-win situation Joe finds himself in is that the mob boss he used to do jobs for is dying of cancer, and the DA is doing everything he can to coerce a deathbed confession from him. From there, I put Joe in increasingly worse situations as he tries to keep the mob boss from talking, as well as keeping others in the town who have deep-seated grudges against him from killing him.

When I plot a Julius Katz story, it’s all about the puzzle, yet in all of the stories outside of the first one, the stories still sprang out of an initial idea that had nothing to do with the eventual murder mystery. The first story, “Julius Katz,” is also different from the others in that it’s really about solving two puzzles—the murder mystery, and, for Archie, figuring out why Julius has been acting “unusually” with regard to Lily Rosten. With “Archie’s Been Framed” (the EQMM Readers Award winner in 2010), the story started with the idea of Archie dating a woman through the Internet who is going to end up murdered, leaving Archie as the chief suspect. The why and how of the murder was figured out later as part of the puzzle. With my full-length ebook, Julius Katz and Archie, the idea that triggered the novel was a mystery writer hiring Julius to figure out who is trying to kill him as part of an elaborate publicity stunt— only to end up actually murdered. Again, the puzzle was put together later. With “One Angry Julius Katz and Eleven Befuddled Jurors,” the idea leading to the story was having a petulant Julius stuck on a jury with a once-in-a-lifetime gourmet dinner approaching. With my upcoming “Archie Solves the Case,” the idea that triggered the story was to be able to have Archie claim that he was equally responsible for solving the murder, even if his logic could be considered a little fuzzy.

When working out the puzzles for these stories, I have several murder suspects, all with legitimates reasons to want to commit the murder, but the clues planted in the story will lead Julius and the reader to the solution if they look carefully enough.

I’ll wrap this up by mentioning that just as reading noir fiction can be both exhilarating and draining, the same is true with writing noir. I guess it comes down to this: Plumbing the human depths can be an exhausting experience. And just as reading Nero Wolfe books was always a fun and enjoyable experience for me, the same is true of writing Julius Katz. I doubt I’ll ever find a more enjoyable character to write about and spend time with than Archie. So I guess that answers why I take breaks from writing noir and crime fiction to spend time in Julius’s and Archie’s world—I need the respite those characters give me!

Posted in Characters, Guest, Noir, Writers | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

“Where Does It Happen?” (by Terrie Farley Moran)

Terrie Farley Moran is a short-story writer published in EQMM, AHMM, and a number of mystery anthologies. In 2009, one of her stories earned a place on the Best American Mystery Stories Distinguished Mysteries list. She is not only a writer of short stories, however; she is also one of the field’s most avid readers of them. She even wore the editor’s hat in 2011 for an anthology of original short stories, the second book from the Tri-State Chapter of Sisters in Crime, Murder New York Style: Fresh Slices. She’s obviously someone who has thought a lot about the storyteller’s art and she’s here to offer her view of where it often all begins. . . . —Janet Hutchings

Most fiction writers will tell you that plot, character, and setting are the underpinnings of the sturdy three-legged stool that supports a well-told yarn.

And as much as we all agree to the general premise, I find it amusing that arguing about the relative importance of each leg is a full-time parlor game among writers. Someone will suggest that a mind-bending plot is all that matters. Another writer counters that characters are the most important story element. Whether a character is empathetic or offensive doesn’t matter as long as the reader cares about the character’s plight. Then there are folks convinced that an exotic setting will draw the reader into a tale so that they can “live” in the unique environment for a while.

And where do I stand on all this? Well, I come down firmly on the side of setting. Nope. I’m not kidding. Think about it. Would the story of Beauty and the Beast be as powerful if the Beast lived in a two-bedroom apartment nestled over a tea shop, rather than a huge and forbidding castle in a dense and dark forest? I don’t think so.

It’s not that I’m committed to using only story times and places that are out of the ordinary. On the contrary, I often find a local setting that intrigues me and I develop a story to show it off. A while ago I wrote “Fontaine House” (EQMM, August 2012). It came about because I had rented a small place for a couple of months on the banks of the Caloosahatchee River in southwest Florida. I quickly became enamored of the river and day after day I spent time communing with its majesty. It didn’t take long for me to realize that the Caloosahatchee had a story to tell and it wanted me to tell it. So I created a family who resided about twenty miles down river on an island in the Gulf of Mexico, and then I invented a historical house a few miles up river. Finally I tied the geography and the people together with one present-day murder and one Civil War-era murder. In my heart, the river remains the moving force of the entire tale.

Setting is the inspiration for much of my writing, particularly for stories that take place in my native New York City. Times Square sounds one way. Battery Park sounds another. Once I hear the voices, the story comes together.

I am the first to admit that my love of setting is not a requirement for a great read. There are wonderful stories that could have been written in nearly any generic setting, but in some stories the setting defines the characters and intensifies the plot. As an example, I suggest you read “Misprision of Felony” by O’Neil De Noux, available in the December 2012 issue of Ellery Queen’s Mystery Magazine. The story has powerful characters and a fascinating plot, but I contend that it is the setting of post-Katrina New Orleans that gives the story its most potent emotional impact. Take a look and tell me if you agree.

Posted in Fiction, Guest, Magazine, Setting | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

ONE OF MY FAVORITE SERIES

In my last post I said I wished there was more talk of the work of classic authors in the field at mystery conventions. One writer who ought to be considered a luminary of the genre, and worthy of such discussion, is Edward D. Hoch.  Ed’s talents and overall accomplishments have been talked about on this site before, but in this post I want to focus on one of his series in particular and how I see it as a fan.

Over the seventeen years I worked with Ed at Ellery Queen’s Mystery Magazine, I had the pleasure of editing twelve of his long-running series. The nearly 200 stories that emerged from those series during that time comprised less than half of his output for EQMM, where he had a thirty-four-year unbroken streak of publication in every monthly issue of the magazine.

My favorite of all of these excellent series was that starring Dr. Sam Hawthorne. Many fans of this series, which began in 1974, cite its locked-room and impossible-crime puzzles as what chiefly attracts them to the stories. In the Hawthorne tales one finds some of the best Hoch plots, perhaps because he liked to save the most difficult kind of puzzle, that of the locked-room, for his country doctor.

As brilliant as the plots of the Hawthorne stories are, however, they are only a part of the magic the series has for me. Ed Hoch had many exceptional talents beyond plotting. One of them was the ability to create a milieu that readers could look forward to returning to again and again. Set in the New England town of Northmont in the 1920s through ’40s, the Hawthorne stories have a certain parallel to the Miss Marple stories and novels of Agatha Christie, whose early cases were set in roughly the same period of time, in the English village of St. Mary Mead. The settings of both series are relatively self-contained; both create ambiances in which the occurrence of crime should be an anomaly; and both include some returning supporting characters. But Northmont has always felt to me a more real and vital place than St. Mary Mead, and I think that may be partly because, unlike Miss Marple, Dr. Sam Hawthorne is not primarily an observer of his town—he’s an active participant in all that goes on.

As a young, single doctor, Dr. Sam is involved in all sorts of relationships—personal, professional, and civic—with characters who turn out to be suspects, victims, and witnesses. He has a stake in what happens that goes beyond achieving justice, and his supporting characters become more important, as the series progresses, than they ever could be were his primary role that of observer.  The supporting characters of Northmont are part of Dr. Sam’s personal story, a story that, spun out over some seventy adventures, provides as compelling a reason to continue reading the stories, for many readers—myself included—as are the astonishingly clever puzzles each story contains.

If you followed the adventures of Dr. Sam in EQMM over the years, or have read any of the collections of the stories by Crippen and Landru Publishers, you’ll know that the good doctor doesn’t remain the same over time.  This is one fictional series that progresses in something like real time. Hawthorne moves on, and so do the times. With each case told as a reminiscence, we’re guided by an elderly Dr. Sam through the decades of his youth, with all of the attendant changes to Northmont, the country, and the world. Part of the pleasant expectation with which I used to open the manuscript of a new Hawthorne story was that of seeing how the milieu, and the characters, had changed.  And Ed Hoch always delivered. One of the things being his editor for so many years proved to me is that he was a scrupulous researcher. Using primarily his own extensive personal library, he brought to bear the kind of detail that made his settings places I felt I could walk right into. And I can honestly say that I never detected a historical error in any of his stories.

If you haven’t yet made Hawthorne’s acquaintance, I recommend you try one of the collections. There’s a respect in which I envy newcomers to the series: You don’t know yet how Sam’s life turned out. Although his creator died suddenly and unexpectedly in 2008, he had revealed, only a few years earlier, answers to two of the key questions that had kept readers going over the decades: Did Northmont’s most eligible bachelor ever marry? And how old is the retired Dr. Sam who narrates the tales?

I won’t chance spoiling your reading by answering those questions for you. I think the author himself had some reservations about resolving all of that. For although he believed that Nick Velvet—an eccentric and endearing thief who became the subject of a French television series—was his most popular sleuth, he too seems to have believed that Hawthorne was one of his most important creations.

One of the Dr. Sam stories that has stayed in my mind over the years is 2001’s “The Problem of the Yellow Wallpaper.” In it, we see several facets of this fictional character that remind me of qualities his author also had. There’s the clever puzzle solver; that’s a given. But there’s also the compassionate doctor who provides a job for his former nurse, April, when her husband is called up for reserve duty in the Navy just prior to America’s entry into WWII, and who protests the ill treatment of an apparently mentally disturbed patient. In this story, too, we see the author’s knowledge of the literature preceding him; the story involves direct references to Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s classic horror story “The Yellow Wallpaper.”  And if that doesn’t demonstrate that knowing something about the history of a form is relevant to writing well—and, as a reader, to understanding what is currently being written—I’m not sure what would.—Janet Hutchings

Posted in Characters, Conventions, Fiction, History, Magazine, Setting, Writers | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

“Living with the Ghosts of Halloween” (by Toni L. P. Kelner)

Agatha Award winning author Toni L. P. Kelner has written several stories for EQMM, including two pirate tales. How appropriate, then, that she’s blogging for us on Halloween, when many of the costumed villains appearing at your doors will, no doubt, be of that swashbuckling variety. These days the Boston area author mostly writes about “ghoulies and ghosties.” She is the co-editor, with New York Times bestselling author Charlaine Harris, of a series of paranormal anthologies, the fourth of which, An Apple for the Creature, came out in September. Under her pseudonym Leigh Perry, she’s started a new “Family Skeleton” series with Berkley Prime Crime, the first book in which will be The Skeleton in the Armoire (September 2013).  Who better to start off a mysterious Halloween for us?Janet Hutchings

I adore Halloween, and always have. I love it when the decorations show up, the costume stores appear like magic, and spooky music fills the malls. Of course, Halloween these days is big business. The holiday I remember mumblety-mumble years ago, when I was a young goblin, was much simpler. Still, my witch’s brew had certain key ingredients:

1.     Dressing up

What’s Halloween without pretending to be someone or something you’re not? Now, my childhood costumes were not overly elaborate. One year I was a princess in a chintzy costume-in-a-box with a stiff plastic face mask, and other years I wore my big  sisters’ ballet costumes from past recitals. (I wore the red satin gypsy costume two years in a row because two of my sisters had danced in the same outfit, giving me a smaller size and a larger size.) Some years I recycled my own ballet costumes—one memorable getup was a pink fur bunny costume from my bravura performance at our dance studio’s Easter fashion show. Plus there were the usual handmade creations—a pirate with cut-off shorts and an itchy mustache my mother painted on with mascara, a witch with a construction-paper hat and another sister’s Puritan costume, and so on.

Still, no matter how modest the costume, I happily imagined myself in a different life for the evening.

2.     The Halloween Carnival

My elementary school had a wonderful carnival every year, with each class’s parents adding to the festivities. There was a haunted house (which wasn’t all that frightening even when I was in third grade); a ventriloquist act (the ventriloquist dummy was considerably more creepy than the haunted house); various games with darts, rings, and ducks (everybody won a prize, and other than the glory year I won a shiny red baton, I always got white plastic bears, which fortunately I liked); a costume contest (I won second place wearing that pink fur bunny costume), and cake walks (the best part of which was that everybody who played got a cupcake). In later years they added a moon bounce, and it was well worth the damage to my costume to go in that thing.

3.     Trick-or-treating

Dressing up, wandering in the dark, getting candy. What’s not to love?

As the youngest of four girls, I was always accompanied by one or more sisters while my parents stayed home to give candy to other kids. The best parts of this were being out at night without the aforementioned parents, getting to play with the flashlight without worrying about saving the batteries in case of an emergency, and going to those special houses that had spooky decorations.

I even loved trick-or-treating the year it rained all night. My mother dressed us kids up in old coats and hats instead of costumes so we stayed somewhat warm, if not particularly dry. That was also the year someone gave my sister a rock wrapped in tin foil, just like in the Charlie Brown Halloween show, and we all got a huge kick out of that. I also remember one family who refused to give us candy, saying that the city had moved Halloween to the next night. My sisters and I weren’t the tricking type, but those guys sure deserved a trick for that. (Yes, I do hold grudges.)

4.     Candy

That’s another no-brainer. I mean, candy!

And it wasn’t just eating the sweets, though that was certainly enjoyable. I had enormous fun counting how much I’d gotten, sorting it by categories and quality (miniature candy bars were the gold standard—Bit-O-Honey was the one nobody wanted), gloating over it, and hoarding it until my mother threw away those last three Bits-O-Honey around Christmas time.

As time has gone on, my Halloween traditions have changed, of course. Some years I still dress up, but mostly I confine myself to festive pins, though this year I do have a set of Halloween Mickey Mouse ears I’m dying to try out. The Halloween carnival morphed into a bland fall festival run by professional fund-raisers rather than by parents giving kids a good time, and I don’t think they’ve given out white plastic bears in years. As for the candy, I’m a giver of treats now, instead of a receiver, but that’s fun in a different way. (We always give out good candy, by the way—never Bit-O-Honey.)

In looking back, I think the reasons I enjoyed that version of the holiday are the same reasons I enjoy the writing life.

Start with the dressing up. Though I may not sew up the costumes, I definitely put myself into different lives in order to write about them. Sometimes those characters are more mundane—regular people in today’s world—but sometime I pull out the funky costumes, and write about vampires and werewolves and zombie raisers. My current work-in-progress features an ambulatory skeleton named Sid, which has forced me to get under the skin of a character who doesn’t actually have any skin.

Then there’s my analog to going to the Halloween carnival: attending conventions. What’s a convention but bunches of people all gathered together to have fun? True, they don’t usually have moon bounces, but there are costume contests and party buffets that sometimes include cupcakes. I’ve even brought home prizes ranging from free books to writing awards. Plus I’ve never seen a ventriloquist at Bouchercon or Malice Domestic, which gives conventions the edge.

I’ve got to stretch my metaphor just a bit to fit in trick-or-treating, but it’s not unlike book promotion events. I put on my author costume, go out among strangers trying to look cute, and hope to come back with goodies. The goodies these days are monetary, but no less sweet to me. Nobody has ever tried to pay for a book with a rock wrapped in tin foil—I’m not sure if that’s a good thing or disappointing.

And you remember that grudge I still have against the family that wouldn’t give my sisters and me any candy one rainy Halloween night? Back then, I had no way of exacting revenge, but now I have the perfect trick to play. I can plop them into a book and beat them up, arrest them, even murder them! Like Halloween pleasures, that never gets old.

Then there’s my somewhat obsessive behavior with Halloween candy. If we let the candy represent money, or perhaps sales figures, my candy hoarding now turns into careful accounting, sales tracking, and income projection. Just think what I could have done with a spreadsheet back then. I could have mapped out the houses that distributed Bit-O-Honey and avoided them forever.

So here I am at my desk, with the skeletal rubber duck, zombie statue, three sparkly skeletons, windup skeletons, vampire finger puppet, and Lego witch—all of which are everyday decorations, not just for October 31.

Happy Halloween to the rest of you, but as for me, I enjoy Halloween every day.

Posted in Characters, Conventions, Guest, Noir, Supernatural, Thrillers, Writers | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment